Too many tests take away from teaching time.» type a response

abotion should not be available or even exist. this is basically killing babies. but wait isnt murdering wrong? yes! so why is it ok for us to kill babies just because they are really small. also, i am sure that alot of people would be more responsible instead of just saying well if i get pregnant oh well i can just get an abortion. a baby cannot be killed (punished) for a mistake that it's parents made. the baby didnt ask to be brought into the world» type a response

immigration helps other countries. By opening your doors to less develped countries, you are giving them an opportunity to send money back to their home country. You are helpig fight poverty.» type a response

Defend your debate topic here...» type a response

I want anyone to add ideas about this topic. I live in Australia and I firmly believe that it should be the choice of the cyclist to choosed whether or not they wear a helmet. If they are hurt then that is their responsibilty. Their was even a study conducted by a traffic psychologist, Dr Walker, were he had heaps of equipment on his bike to measure how far from him cars were when he was overtaken. He wore a helmet half the time, and spent the other half without a helmet. On average, cars stayed a furthur 9cm away from him and his bike when he wasn't wearing a helmet. He was hit twice, both times when wearing a helmet, and what does this prove? That wearing a bicycle helmet puts you at more risk at being struck by a car, than when you are without a helmet. And there is also evidence that showed that the amount of cyclists on the road decreased after the compuslory helmet lawd were introduced in Australia. As well as this, when the law was introduced in Aussie states in 1991, it wasn't because there was extensive research proving that helmets would make cyclists safer, and decrease road injuries and fatalities. No, it was because the Federal Government in Canberra threatened the state governments. They said that if the states didn't introduce the law, then they would cut their road funding. Well, that is my opinion, or part of it at least. I don't yet know what side I will be on for the debate, but I hope it is afffirmative. Any replies with your opinions would be appreciated, no matter what your opinion is, no matter if it is or isn't mandatory where you live. Please provided evidence or facts if possible!!!» type a response

The Rock and the River by Kekla Magoon should be taught to next year's 6th graders. I was very detailed and seemed real. I learned a lot about the 1960s and the Civil RIghts Movement that I did not know before reading the book. The characters were real and so were the setting and the conflict. Plus, I enjoyed the story. I cared about Stick and I realy was appalled when he was killed in the novel. I think next year's students will enjoy. It is one of the best written historical fiction novels I have ever read.» type a response

YES YOU SHOULD!!! If you think I'm a little nuts in my blogs for WeDebate.it, you should see the random absurdity I intend to post on Twitter. Follow me @DJJB78!!! That's DJJB78!!!! ONE MORE TIME!!! THAT'S DJJB78!!! I'm also on Facebook!!!» type a response

I think that Americans shouldnt have bombed hiroshma» type a response

Applebee's Neighborhood Grill and Bar is the worst restaurant chain in america. The food is terrible and the service is even worse. I have honestly seen a major decline in their food quality over the past 2 years. I used to equate Applebee's to a much higher quality than those chains like Max and Erma's and TGIFridays, but anymore, Fridays and Max and Erma's are much better. I hate Applebee's and hope they change their act around... And fast.» type a response

The Death Penealy should be banned because what is the moral in it? Murder is against the law so why have the death peanalty by leathal injection around? Were besically saying lets kill someone to show you that its wrong to kill someone? That make no sense, kill someone for killing someone? It stupid, unmoral and uncalled for. Life sentence is good enough, but not the death penalty. By having the death penealty its almost saying its fine to kill someone for killing. You can think "Oh since we have the death penaltly I can just kill this man for killing my loved one."» type a response